Friday, May 1, 2015

Changing Windows' Icons




You can change the Icons Windows uses for folders, the Start Menu, opened and closed folder in the Explorer, and many more.
1. Open RegEdit
2. Go to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ Software\ Microsoft\ Windows\ CurrentVersion\ Explorer\ Shell Icons
3. Add a string value for each Icon you wish to change.
Example: "3" ="C:\Windows\Icons\MyIcon.ico,0" This will change the closed folders in the Explorer to "MyIcon.ico". Here is a complete list for each value.
0= Unknown file type
1= MSN file types
2= Applications Generic
3= Closed Folder
4= Open Folder
5= 5.25" Drive
6= 3.25" Drive
7= Removable Drive
8= Hard Drive
9= NetWork Drive
10= Network Drive Offline
11= CD-ROM Drive
12= RAM Drive
13= Entire Network
14= Network Hub
15= My Computer
16= Printer
17= Network Neighborhood
18= Network Workgroup
19= Start Menu's Program Folders
20= Start Menu's Documents
21= Start Menu's Setting
22= Start Menu's Find
23= Start Menu's Help
24= Start Menu's Run
25= Start Menu's Suspend
26= Start Menu's PC Undock
27= Start Menu's Shutdown
28= Shared
29= Shortcut Arrow
30= (Unknown Overlay)
31= Recycle Bin Empty
32= Recycle Bin Full
33= Dial-up Network
34= DeskTop
35= Control Panel
36= Start Menu's Programs
37= Printer Folder
38= Fonts Folder
39= Taskbar Icon
40= Audio CD
You need to reboot after making changes. You may need to delete the hidden file ShellIconCache if after rebooting the desired Icons are not displayed.
Thanks to : www.easydesksoftware.com

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Laptop RAM


LAPTOP RAM


Two main forms of modern RAM are static RAM (SRAM) and dynamic RAM (DRAM). In SRAM, a bit of data is stored using the state of a six transistor memory cell. This form of RAM is more expensive to produce, but is generally faster and requires less power than DRAM and, in modern computers, is often used as cache memory for the CPU. DRAM stores a bit of data using a transistor and capacitor pair, which together comprise a DRAM memory cell. The capacitor holds a high or low charge (1 or 0, respectively), and the transistor acts as a switch that lets the control circuitry on the chip read the capacitor's state of charge or change it. As this form of memory is less expensive to produce than static RAM, it is the predominant form of computer memory used in modern computers.
Both static and dynamic RAM are considered volatile, as their state is lost or reset when power is removed from the system. By contrast, read-only memory (ROM) stores data by permanently enabling or disabling selected transistors, such that the memory cannot be altered. Writeable variants of ROM (such as EEPROM and flash memory) share properties of both ROM and RAM, enabling data to persist without power and to be updated without requiring special equipment. These persistent forms of semiconductor ROM include USB flash drives, memory cards for cameras and portable devices, etc. ECC memory (which can be either SRAM or DRAM) includes special circuitry to detect and/or correct random faults (memory errors) in the stored data, using parity bits or error correction code.
In general, the term RAM refers solely to solid-state memory devices (either DRAM or SRAM), and more specifically the main memory in most computers. In optical storage, the term DVD-RAM is somewhat of a misnomer since, unlike CD-RW or DVD-RW it does not need to be erased before reuse. Nevertheless a DVD-RAM behaves much like a hard disc drive if somewhat slower.

About Desktop RAM




                                              See More : About Desktop RAM

Monday, April 28, 2014

WINDOWS 8.1 DOWNLOAD LINK

Microsoft’s windows 8.1 released end of 2013. So not available Microsoft windows 8.1 crack and patch in market online.
Windows+8.1+activation+crack+and+serial+key+to+make+it+genuine
Windows 8.1 activation crack and serial key to make it genuine




If you don’t any idea about windows 8.1 functionality and experience you should get through the Microsoft first review on windows 8.1(Solved problem from windows 8) upgrade version of windows 8.

Please download and make touchable with windows amazing OS windows 8.1 reviews

Download windows 8.1 from its official site for 32bit and 64bit system from below link


Wednesday, January 15, 2014

TOP 10 ANTIVIRUS IN 2013 - 2014 REVIEW



The Best Antivirus for 2013
Contents
The year 2014 is less than a month away, but for most of the antivirus industry it's already here. Many products have "2014" in the name. Others have stopped using version and year numbers, but they're still "(2014)" editions. These two groups account for more than half of the antivirus products we track. Only a handful of 2013 editions remain. 
As new versions arrive, most of the same products retain their positions at the top of the heap. Here are the best from the current crop of antivirus products.











                       HOW THEY TEST THE ANTIVIRUS





























Independent Lab Tests

I spend hours or days with every product performing hands-on testing, but the independent antivirus labs have whole squads of researchers for even more in-depth testing. I follow a half-dozen labs that perform ongoing tests and that make their results public: , AV-Test, AV-Comparatives, Dennis Technology Labs, ICSA Labs, Virus Bulletin, and West Coast Labs.
I take independent testing quite seriously, and I recently worked up a new system to evaluate each product in light of its lab results. I've identified five important categories: detection, cleaning, protection, false positives, and performance. When there's enough data from the labs, I use it to calculate a star rating in each category, and an overall rating.

As you can see in the chart below, Kaspersky and Bitdefender get really excellent scores across the board. That's certainly a good sign. 
Even the independent labs don't have unlimited resources, so there's a dearth of results for some products. I'll be talking with some of the more flexible labs about the possibility of expanding the collection of products they test. 
Symantec contends that many tests don't reflect real-world protection, so the occasional low score for Norton AntiVirus (2014) isn't a big deal. Symantec also opts out entirely from certain tests. I find, though, that there are plenty of dynamic, real-world tests that quite accurately simulate a user's experience. I also observe that other vendors manage to ace these tests. 
Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus (2014) is another story. Its cloud-based behavioral monitoring is wildly different from almost any other product, and it's just not compatible with many test setups. As a result, it hardly gets tested at all. That's a shame, because it's amazingly tiny and scans amazingly fast.
For a detailed description of the lab tests that I follow and of the way I summarize them into a chart like the one below, please see How We Interpret Antivirus Lab Tests.
Hands-On Testing

For every antivirus review, I run a hands-on test of the product's ability to detect and prevent malware attack. I also check each product's ability to detect and prevent download of the very latest malware. Starting with a feed of links from London-based MRG-Effitas, I sift out those that point directly to a malicious executable online. Using executable file links makes it easy for me to measure success. If a malicious download reaches the desktop, the antivirus failed. If it wipes out the file during download, or blocks access to the URL completely, it succeeded. 

The links I use are never more than a day old, sometimes just hours old. That means each product hits a different set of links, but in every case they're extremely recent. I do plug away until I've tested about 100 links, figuring the daily differences will average out. This is definitely more real-world than my standard malware blocking test, which necessarily uses the same samples for as much as a year. As I run more products through the malicious URL blocking tests, I'll give it more emphasis in my ratings. 
The chart below shows results from both tests. For more detail on my test methods, see How We Test Malware Blocking
In the past I've run tests evaluating how well products clean up systems infested with live, active malware. An incident with GameOver Zeus using my test systems for its own purposes convinced me that this kind of testing isn't as safe as it once was. I can't in good conscience keep running a test that might cause harm outside my testbed, so I'll be relying more on the independent labs. I will, of course, continue to explore and report on the tools and services that each vendor offers to handle malware that prevents antivirus installation, or subverts the scanning process. 
The Best Products
The antivirus field is huge; I currently track over 45 products. In a field that big there's room for multiple products to earn the title of Editors' Choice.
With its impressive sweep of the independent labs, Kaspersky Anti-Virus (2014) is another very good choice. Had I crafted my new lab-analysis system earlier, Kaspersky would have been Editors' Choice, and Norton wouldn't. 

AVG AntiVirus FREE 2014 is our current Editors' Choice for free antivirus. It shares the top score in my hands-on malware blocking test with four others, among them Avira Free AntiVirus (2014) and FortiClient 5.0 (also free).

                                                    COMPARE CHART


                      ALL TRIAL DOWNLOAD LINKS :   http://yescaresystems.blogspot.in